Klimaatoptimist Arnout Jaspers spreekt
Volgende week woensdag 4 september is hij een avond lang onze gast, maar wij zochten hem alvast op,
Jaspers schreef na de bestseller De stikstoffuik het boek De klimaatoptimist. Daarin legt hij uit dat we geen reden hebben om in paniek te raken over klimaatverandering.
Clintel Foundation
Datum: 29 augustus 2024
Maybe a title
Voorbeeld: However, some people are so concerned about the ways to push climate change and CO₂ reduction that they are going out of their minds, according to Lindzen. “They’re showing this temperature graph. And I think they’re realizing people are saying, you know, you draw it like this (going sharply up – HS), but this is one degree. That’s not much. And they’re worried: this is not getting people worried enough. So they’re saying: well, showing them a flood, showing them a storm, that would be visually convincing,” he says. And as it happens, there are always places on Earth that suffer from extreme weather in a way that occurs only once in a hundred years. “And people don’t figure it out that a once in a hundred years event is occurring some place on Earth every month, or five places every month. You have a picture of that. You now put that on television and you can associate ‘climate change’ with something dramatic,” Lindzen says. “The fact that they had to go to that to convince people suggests it was a fake issue because they’re clearly using something that would be normally called false advertising,” he adds.
Maybe a title
Voorbeeld: However, some people are so concerned about the ways to push climate change and CO₂ reduction that they are going out of their minds, according to Lindzen. “They’re showing this temperature graph. And I think they’re realizing people are saying, you know, you draw it like this (going sharply up – HS), but this is one degree. That’s not much. And they’re worried: this is not getting people worried enough. So they’re saying: well, showing them a flood, showing them a storm, that would be visually convincing,” he says. And as it happens, there are always places on Earth that suffer from extreme weather in a way that occurs only once in a hundred years. “And people don’t figure it out that a once in a hundred years event is occurring some place on Earth every month, or five places every month. You have a picture of that. You now put that on television and you can associate ‘climate change’ with something dramatic,” Lindzen says. “The fact that they had to go to that to convince people suggests it was a fake issue because they’re clearly using something that would be normally called false advertising,” he adds.
Voorbeeldtekst: However, some people are so concerned about the ways to push climate change and CO₂ reduction that they are going out of their minds, according to Lindzen. “They’re showing this temperature graph. And I think they’re realizing people are saying, you know, you draw it like this (going sharply up – HS), but this is one degree. That’s not much. And they’re worried: this is not getting people worried enough. So they’re saying: well, showing them a flood, showing them a storm, that would be visually convincing,” he says. And as it happens, there are always places on Earth that suffer from extreme weather in a way that occurs only once in a hundred years. “And people don’t figure it out that a once in a hundred years event is occurring some place on Earth every month, or five places every month. You have a picture of that. You now put that on television and you can associate ‘climate change’ with something dramatic,” Lindzen says. “The fact that they had to go to that to convince people suggests it was a fake issue because they’re clearly using something that would be normally called false advertising,” he adds.
meer nieuws
Duitslands nucleaire ‘bekentenis’ is een barst voor Net Zero
Wanneer de volgende langdurige koudegolf, droogte of piek in de vraag toeslaat, zal de zwakte van de anti-fossiele benadering tot uiting komen: in hogere rekeningen, stroomonderbrekingen en publieke woede. De politieke klasse kan de realiteit niet eeuwig blijven ontwijken, zegt Vijay Jayaraj.
“Mannelijk gedrag slecht voor de planeet”, aldus Phys.org
Het wereldwijde klimaatdebat lijkt enigszins in de richting van de sceptici te kantelen. Maar, zoals Charles Rotter hieronder laat zien, de andere, alarmistische kant komt nog steeds met behoorlijk extreme en bizarre klimaatverhalen.
’s Werelds Belangrijkste Wetenschappelijke Adviescommissie
Het groepje wetenschappers dat de wereldwijde klimaatscenario’s bepaalt, is zeer klein. De invloed is sterk geconcentreerd bij slechts twee instellingen: het International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) in Oostenrijk en het Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) in Duitsland, toont Roger Pielke Jr. aan. En dat is nog maar één aspect van de obscure wijze waarop de scenario’s worden vastgesteld.
